Dr. Christopher Thomspson, the L.A., California former emergency room doctor who was convicted on all counts of felony assault wtih a deadly weapon after nearly killing two cyclists along Mandeville Canyon Road in THE cycling case of recent years faces a Superior Court Judge in Los Angeles for sentencing today. Prosecutors are asking for 8 years. The Los Angeles Times has an eloquent and extensive report at the link.
This story was covered here at Bad Lawyer and by the great cycling publication Velo News and you can find their website here, where no doubt comments from the cycling community all over the world, can be read. Since one of the managing editors of Velo News is veteran journalist and newly-minted good attorney, Charles Pelkey I expect excellent coverage and commentary. Speaking of which, here's the link to Pelkey's story on the sentencing.
Showing posts with label LA doctor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LA doctor. Show all posts
Friday, January 8, 2010
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Prior Bad Acts--The LA Doctor/Cyclist Road Rage Case
Charles Pelkey, a Wyoming lawyer and cycling advocate had a terrific "explainer" at VeloNews today, relating to the question of admission of evidence of "Prior Bad Acts" in the criminal trial of the LA emergency room physician Dr. Christopher Thomas Thompson convicted Monday of multiple counts of felony assault. As you will recall Dr. Thompson pulled his luxury sedan in front of two road cyclists and stopped propelling one cyclist into the rear window of his car nearly severing the cyclist's nose and causing various serious injuries to both riders.
Pelkey's essay dealt with the introduction of evidence at trial of numerous other incidents involving this doctor and bicyclists. The question is how does this evidence come in against a criminal defendant when as a general principle a person may not be convicted of crime based on evidence of prior similar acts. The same principle applies generally to civil lawsuits. Read Pelkey's explanation, see http://www.velonews.com/article/99827/the-explainer---doctor-behaving-badly
Pelkey's essay dealt with the introduction of evidence at trial of numerous other incidents involving this doctor and bicyclists. The question is how does this evidence come in against a criminal defendant when as a general principle a person may not be convicted of crime based on evidence of prior similar acts. The same principle applies generally to civil lawsuits. Read Pelkey's explanation, see http://www.velonews.com/article/99827/the-explainer---doctor-behaving-badly
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

