Mom Jailed for Defying Order to Produce 9 Year Old for Visitation with Rapist Father

The New York Daily News reports on the Judge (picture) who reversed herself and freed the mother she ordered jailed after the mother refused to let her 9 year old visit his rapist "father."  This is reporter, William Sherman's story:

Sukhwant Herb, 29, who defied Brooklyn Family Court Judge Robin Sheares' visitation order, was to be released to her lawyer's custody.  Sheares abrupt change of mind came after the Daily News reported on Sunday how Herb was sentenced to 50 days at Rikers Island on June 10 for refusing to send young Seon into the 'horrible, horrific' environment of prison.

High court officials were shocked that Sheares locked Herb up without giving her a chance to post bail, as well as by the judge's comments in court, according to sources. At a June 10 hearing, Sheares ranted, 'Shame, shame, shame, you see how shameful she [Herb] is,' according to a transcript. 'She's gonna get arrested and her kids are not gonna know where she is.'

Last night, the judge said that Herb must appear in court today with her son as a condition of her freedom.

'No bail in a case like this is really shocking,' said Herb's lawyer, Dale Frederick. 'My client has not been charged with a crime, has never been charged with a crime - and even felons get bail,' said.  The case began when Herb, who first agreed to the prison visits last Sept. 15, changed her mind, ignored the order and skipped four court appearances. Seon Jonas, the father of Herb's son, was convicted in 2003 of raping three women in Phoenix - while he and Herb were living in Phoenix - and is serving 27 years in a state prison."
__________________________
I am pretty sure I related the story of Edith (not her real name) on Bad Lawyer, previously, if not it was one of the most sickening cases I have ever been involved with in my career.  Edith's husband and the "father" of her little girls sexually abused his daughters giving one daughter a venereal disease. 

While evidence that the little girls were sexually abused had been confirmed, and the close male relatives were under suspicion, a domestic relations judge ordered the Mother to produce the daughters for visitation and when she refused jailed her.  The local Sheriff allowed Edith to camp out in his office in relative comfort.  The Sheriff released Edith the next day after we were able to generate publicity for her situation and the Sheriff informed the court that there was no room in the local jail. 

Judges have the capacity for genuine justice which is afterall, judgment and mercy.  Most judges take this command deadly seriously. The Rule of Law and respect for the law are products of judgment and mercy--it sounds like Judge Sheares had this as an epiphany.   

Saffold Gone, Gone, Gone...

As predicted, here, on Bad Lawyer the Ohio Supremes removed Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold from further proceedings in the Cleveland serial killer case.  According to Cleveland.com the Judge was posting comments at their website under several pseudonyms critical of law enforcemnet, public figures, lawyers, and regarding proceedings which were pending before her. 

This story is, perfectly, at the intersection of race, ego, social networking, justice, and ethics.  More to come.

Late Friday morning, Cleveland.com reported that former Cleveland Browns linebacker and currrent Common Pleas Judge drew the re-assignment of the Sowell case.

Judge Snite Is in a Snit!

Coucilman Kelly is suing a political critic, Paul Corbett for defamation in the Philadelphia courtroom of Judge A.J. Snite, Jr. according to the Philadelphia Inquirer website.  The trial is off to quite a start with the Judge interrupting the defendant's opening statement and threatening to jail the defense attorney.  This is from Jeff Shields article at Philly.com, on the courtroom drama:

"Judge A.J. Snite Jr. stopped proceedings during opening statements to call a sheriff's deputy to the courtroom. The judge warned C. Scott Shields, attorney for defendant Paul Corbett, that 'you're going to be taken into custody,'  if Shields continued to interpret the state constitution for the jurors.

The judge said he had warned Shields three times against doing that and yelled and banged and pounded the bench with his hand as he warned Shields to 'stop smiling.'

'I'm not going to proceed here unless there's a sheriff who can take you into custody if need be,' the judge said. Kelly is suing Corbett for defamation for fliers that Corbett distributed during the 2007 general election that accused Kelly of supporting the 'homosexual lobby' and 'sodomy' and corruption of minors for his vote to end the city's rent-free lease on the Boy Scouts' headquarters at 22nd and Spring Garden Streets.

The judge stopped Shields as he was reading from the Pennsylvania Constitution regarding the right to free speech and hardly could contain his anger as he told the jury that he would be instructing them on the law, not the attorney.  Just before 11:30 a.m. Shields asked the judge for a mistrial for his comments in front of the jury, and to recuse himself because he believed his client could not get a fair trial before Snite.Snite denied both motions from the bench and called the jury back so Shields could finish his opening statement."
___________________________________________________
Several points to be made:

First, what a great name for Judge, A.J. Snite, Jr.  I mean it's full-Dickensian!   I was looking at websites and I learned that Judge Snite's first name is Albert.  Apparently he is a longtime member of the Common Pleas Court Criminal Division.  Bear in mind this is a civil defamation.

Secondly, how did this case get to trial?  I'd love to see the motion practice--afterall, Councilman Kelly is a "public figure" and especially in the area of political discourse, the courts have historically permitted the rankest sort of accusation and fabrication from time immemorial.  More on defamation in a subsequent post.

Trying a case in front of a honked off Judge is quite nerve-wracking--on one hand I've seen lawyers who routinely provoked this sort of reaction out of a Judge (on Bad Lawyer we discussed Geoffrey Fieger, and Phillip Kay); on the otherhand, I've had the unjustifiably out-of-control Judge.  Which is this? 

Trial tactics: opening statements are not arguments.  Opening statements as I've said previously are outlines of the evidence the lawyer believes will be admitted in the case and opening statements provide a narrative for their client's case.  I'm trying to imagine why reading the Pennsylvania and, or US Constitutions made tactical sense, or why the mere reading of these documents constituted "interpreation."  Again we are that point where the published courtroomm coverage leaves us without sufficient information to reach a judgment--on what precisely occurred.  Was the lawyer provocative, or was Judge Snite out of control?!

It is possible to envision a Judge who is perceived by the defense attorney as patently biased an unfair, and through calculation the attorney draws--(is that why, the reporter describes the Judge as being upeset about the lawyer "smiling?")--the Judge out on the record to show bias and prejudice for the purpose of an appellate transcript.   That's quite a gamble.  I believe I previously described a Judge in one of my own cases angrily tell a jury that I "lied in chambers about him."  The appellate court while recognizing this as prejudicial error said the Judge cured the error with a "corrective instruction."  But, if you do have a Judge who is going to queer your case, it is not an unheard of strategy to provoke a mistrial. 

Finally, I empathize with both of these lawyers--civil trial work is difficult enough, having an angry Judge means the final outcome will remain in doubt for a long, long time.