Showing posts with label he said-she said. Show all posts
Showing posts with label he said-she said. Show all posts

Thursday, November 4, 2010

He Said, She Said?

A western-Colorado District Attorney is under indictment for exposing himself to 3 women who worked in office over the last few years. Here's an excerpt from the summary by the Associated Press:

"Prosecutors with the state attorney general’s office filed a seven-count complaint against 48-year-old Myrl Serra (pic)Wednesday.  The Daily Sentinel reports that prosecutor Robert Shapiro said that investigators had evidence of one women’s allegations when Serra was arrested and later discovered allegations by two more women.

One of Serra’s attorneys says it’s a 'he-said, she-said' case with no physical evidence.  According to charging documents, Serra is also accused of extortion and having felony unlawful sexual contact sometime in April"
___________________________
I always like it when I read or see where a defense attorney says, it's a He Said, She Said case as if that exonerates a pervert.  In this case it appears that its a He Said, She Said, She Said, She Said--case.  Good luck with that defense!

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Workplace Sexual Harassment-Part Four--the Prosecutor

According the Billings Gazette, the Yellowstone County Proscutor, Dennis Paxinos (the irresistable guy in the pic) allegedly can't keep his hands to himself.  A former legal assistant, Stacie Muhlbeier filed a sexual harassment complaint against Paxinos who "was cleared" of wrong doing by an outside investigator even though he admits "consensual sexual contact." 

According to the account Paxinos left a trail of suggestive emails, and despite being "cleared" the investigation suggested he be disciplined.  The Gazette went to some lengths even filing a lawsuit to obtain the information identifying which of their public officials was the subject of the complaint.

The story is an interesting one because the reporters at the paper took the time to lay out the details of the interaction and the sort of dunderheaded handling of the investigation and its aftermath.  I do sympathize with Paxinos in one sense, the events took place in 2003 he's still paying a personal and professional price 7 years later.   But it looks like he can blame himself, because it seems pretty clear that he participated in a deliberate effort to withhold information from the public. 

I know exactly what that's like.  If the Bad Lawyer had confronted his law office management practices, particularly his tax nightmares and demons timely, he might not be writing this blawg and bitching and moaning about the law from the sidelines.