Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Salvatore Piemonte is Innocent

Syracuse attorney Salvatore Piemonte is innocent of taking $20k from drug dealers in a marijuana deal gone wrong.  This is an excerpt from John O'Brein's Syracuse.com account of Piemonte's acquittal: 

The jury deliberated three hours in federal court in Utica before finding Piemonte innocent of the felony charge of aiding and abetting a conspiracy to sell marijuana. A felony conviction would have automatically disbarred him from from the practice of law. Piemonte has two previous misdemeanor convictions -- for witness-tampering in 1999 and filing a false document with the IRS in 2001.

When the jury announced the verdict at 2 p.m., Piemonte patted the back of his lawyer, Edward Z. Menkin, then leaned his head on Menkin's shoulder and began to break into tears.

"This is without a doubt one of the most difficult things I've had to go through in my life," Piemonte said. "I just want to go back to work."

Piemonte, 56, a former prosecutor and village court judge, was accused last year of accepting $20,000 in cash from the three drug dealers in exchange for providing them with phony documents that they used to convince their marijuana supplier in Canada that their load had been seized by police.

Menkin told jurors the prosecution's case was based on three convicted criminals who'd concocted the story of a crooked lawyer to get reduced prison sentences.
___________________________
Wow, talk about a bullet dodged!   It's a rare thing these days to see a federal jury return a not guilty verdict.  What remains to be seen is whether the feds will let this guy alone.

4 comments:

  1. Um, on a side note, do the Canadians have a civil action case against their US counterparts for this fraudulent business practice? Obviously, they are professional enough to demand that the deal's paperwork be in order. Eh?

    ReplyDelete
  2. From one standpoint, Mr. Piemonte sounds like he might be up to the task.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And, do they play a lot of polo in Syracuse?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think that he has an accusation without reason. specially one like that. Because it is a serious accusation.

    ReplyDelete