A year or more, ago, the Bad Lawyer blawg featured a couple of posts on botched circumcision verdicts and lawsuits. This morning the ABAJournal blawg reports on confirmation of a $4.6 million dollar verdict in California for a botched circumcision. This "approval" by the court was necessary because of a defense challenge based on legislated malpractice caps.
I was planning to revisit this subject because of the proposed San Francisco ban on circumcision which is much in the news due to an ACLU lawsuit disputing the constitutionality of the proposed ban based on religious freedoms.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Hilarious grahic.
ReplyDeleteTK
OW!!!!!!
ReplyDeletemore info on circumcision here - Circumcision Helps Prevent Cervical Cancer
ReplyDeleteEVERY circumcision is a "botched" circumcision.
ReplyDelete@armouris: Go spread your circlist BS on other forums where mutilation fetishists get off on this sick crap. I mean, God forbid that any type of "cutting" would be proposed/imposed on FEMALES in order to reduce any spread of disease (let's face it, the vulva and all its smelly urine-and-smegma-soaked folds can be a vertiable petrie dish for all kinds of nasties).
Oh, and you could cut the female breast cancer rate by HALF just by lopping off one breast (or breast tissue) from each female newborn. Now THERE's research worth looking into!
99% of the lawyers i have had dealings with have been honest.. Joseph parente chicago is not honest. do not trust his word as it is worthless. he will cheat you without the slightest feeling of guilt fast talker with no conscience
ReplyDelete