Super Lawyers is an advertising and promotional publication by a Minnesota-based operation that publishes a "magazine" and does magazine inserts around the country. These types of promotional resources have existed in the law profession as long as I've been an attorney, Martindale-Hubbell which is owned by Lexis-Nexis, Inc. (which also owns, Law.com)--was the publication you wanted to be listed in when I was a "mere youth." The Bad Lawyer is "A-V" rated, cool, huh? Frankly, it's more important to be listed in the phone book, even better to be on your prospective client's "speed dial."
Of all these sorts of promo publications, Super Lawyers is the biggest bunch of BULLSHIT I'm familiar with in my business. If this is something you're into, you get a bunch of your friends to nominate you and voila, you are a "super lawyer." When I first saw this publication--I don't know, maybe ten years ago?--I was curious. Within a couple of months, a young lawyer that I got a first job for and who I knew to be inexperienced, not a litigator, and just acquiring skills was on the cover of this publication. My reaction, was complete cynicism. Oh, there is one other element, how, ethically, can lawyers promote themselves as "super lawyers," when the disciplinary rules prohibit self-aggrandizing statements in advertisements? Then again how do lawyers get away with the garbage that passes for theri Yellow Page listings and television commercials? Let's face it I'm getting old and cranky.
Oh, the blonde super lawyer that I share the house with--is in actuality a super lawyer in real life (as well as a Super Lawyer), but not because of some BS-advertising scam. She acquired skills, education, and experience, the old fashioned way: (which is the same way you get to Carnegie Hall) practice, practice, practice.
For more on the controversy: http://boston.bizjournals.com/boston/stories/2006/08/07/story2.html
You're not the only one getting old and cranky. So am I.
ReplyDeleteWhat really makes me cranky is when people completely misrepresent the selection process of Super Lawyers because they don't agree with the results of the process.
Here's what Judge Robert Fall, the Special Master selected by the New Jersey Supreme Court, to study and report on our selection process, had to say (this report formed the basis of the Court's ruling in In Re Opinion 39, 2008, a decision that vindicated Super Lawyers, and resulted in the eventual revision of the New Jersey rules on lawyer advertising):
“[The Super Lawyers selection process] is a comprehensive, good-faith and detailed attempt to produce a list of lawyers that have attained high peer recognition, meet ethical standards, and have demonstrated some degree of achievement in their field."
"Suffice to say, the selection procedures employed by Key Professional Media, Inc., are very sophisticated, comprehensive and complex."
“It is absolutely clear from this record that [Super Lawyer does] not permit a lawyer to buy one’s way onto the list, nor is there any requirement for the purchase of any product for inclusion in the lists or any quid pro quo of any kind or nature associated with the evaluation and listing of an attorney or in the subsequent advertising of one’s inclusion in the lists.”
If you want to see the details of our selection process, visit superlawyers.com and click the "Selection Process" tab at the top of the page (I was unable to reproduce the process here because your blog limits comments to 4,000 characters). If after reviewing the process, you have any suggestions on how we might improve it, please let me know.
Oh nonsense. I had a friend sent out an email asking people to vote for her because they knew her. She of course is now a Super Lawyer. What a load. Of carp.
DeleteYeah, well, I choose to rely on magnetic business cards that can be easily applied to refrigerators. Sophisticated, comprehensive and complex.
ReplyDeleteI know nothing of the selection process of Super Lawyers, although I have been listed in the publication for many years. It was my understanding that you could get on the list by recommendations by friends, which to me is not a valid selection method. However, I do not know how i was selected since I did not solicit any recommendations from friends. So, the process may be much more complicated than I know.
ReplyDeleteSuper Lawyers should more broadly publicize the way it selects its awardees.
Patrick
Your a publishing entrepreneur? what a better way to make a killing than marketing to a bunch of prima donna egomaniacs, like shooting fish in a barrel, IMHO
ReplyDeleteExactly right!
DeleteSuperlawyers is bullshit. As a "Superlawyer" myself, I can tell you it is nothing more than a scam to sucker people into buying advertising space. All you have to do is look at the Orange County California to realize this. There are a bunch of local medical malpractice lawyers with mediocre credientials to say the least, who manage to vote for each other and their OCTLA friends, and who now advertise as being among the "Top 50 Lawyers in Orange County," when in reality, if you took a true poll of the local bar and judiciary, they would not make it in the top 1,000. What a joke.
ReplyDeleteI have personally dealt with many so-called "Super Lawyers" in my employment practice. The vast majority of them are the most discourteous, backstabbing, unethical attorneys I have ever encountered. Maybe being on this list went to their head. Two of them (in different cases) point-blank lied to the Court on multiple occasions. Hey, if it makes you a Super Lawyer to get a good result for your client by committing perjury, that's a club I don't want to join.
ReplyDeleteI dealt with a superlawyer recently who proudly states on his firm's website, under notable cases, that they "got someone divorced and prevent someone from getting alimony." This assclown impeded an agreement that was favorable to his client as he objected to a paragraph that is required under our state law. During our final round of negotiations he personally attacked me and when I began to respond he shouted "This conversation is over- only address me in writing." Wow- that is some super lawyer!
ReplyDeleteThe best way to get on the list is to have your peers nominate you. Before you know it you will be on the list and dumb ass clients will be calling you because you are now a super lawyer. If it is on the web people will believe it. I had a good laugh reading the anonymous postings. At first I thought these anonymous people are just upset because they did not appear on the list, but after knowing some of the lawyers that made the top 50 super lawyers, well I must say the list is bogus and lacks credibility. I am sure there are some outstanding lawyers on the list, but what is the point of the list. Perhaps I should start my own magazine and call it "double super duper top attorneys", will that make them better than the "super lawyers"?
ReplyDeleteWe looked into the selection process and it turned out to be a run around. If you need to select an attorney, call the local bar association or get a referral from a reputable attorney. If you need a liner for your bird cage or paper in which to wrap an old dead fish, the "Super Lawyers" publication will do fine.
ReplyDeleteLate to the discussion, but in response to "Bill White," I wouldn't exactly call the language you selected from the NJ opinion, "vindication."
ReplyDeleteCouldn't agree more. Superlawyers is a scam. Superlawyers is bullshit. I may or may not be one, I may or may not know attorneys who are. I can tell you it's an advertisement and the selection-process is a joke.
ReplyDeleteThe sad part is the public gets caught in the misrepresentation. It's disgraceful.
All of the preceding consists of my humble opinion.
Better still. I hired one of these "Superlawyers" in San Fernando Valley. This superlawyer triple billed, refused to object to interim accounting and did not attend the final accounting hearing where fiduciary stole money from the trust, confirmed by probate investigators. As a client, lost total trust in all lawyers. Better go to D.A. for justice.
ReplyDeleteI am a licensed lawyer in Florida and Georgia. The Superlawyer scam is beyond insane. I have had several friends chat me up and request that I vote for them to be included. On nothing more than friendship. And that was really the only basis upon which they could be included, it was not legal ability, lol!
ReplyDeleteI suggest that all lawyers should now advertise that they are Super Lawyers on their website and let the absurd, corrupt bar associations figure it all out.
The public is so SCAMMED and SUCKERED by this absurd nonsense!
And remember, the Bar Associations have their cronies who benefit immensely from being labeled as Super Lawyers. The Judges know them. Special masters know them.
ReplyDeleteLaw Practice is one of the biggest scams in the world. The only justice is that they are beginning to starve (sadly, the good with the bad though).
Hey Superlawyer, STOP killing trees!! I just received your unsolicited 363 page garbage "Superlawyers" publication. It immediately went into the recycling bin
ReplyDeleteAgree with many of the comments here. Super Lawyers is little more than a popularity contest. I'm sure there are some very good attorneys listed, but only by chance. I've seen many attorneys listed on Super Lawyers that were terrible, and in some instances professional malpractice cases waiting to happen. How did they manage to get on Super Lawyers? Self promotion, votes by friends, and a total disregard for actual ability.
ReplyDeletePretty impressive site. The company looks great too.
ReplyDeleteMacon Lawyers
Its quite funny how the lawyers themselves vote for each other, deeming them all SUPER LAWYERS. Some of the worst lawyers out there have this title and some people really buy into it. After having a really bad experience with a lawyer that was deemed a super lawyer, I called SL just to ask how a lawyer was designated a super lawyer...and was shocked to find out about the process. SCAM and JOKE aren't strong enough words for the process.
ReplyDeleteAs an example of how ABSURD this super lawyer scam can, though I agree, some super lawyer winners are indeed great lawyers, take a look at the phony nominated lawyer, Ronald R. House, in 2014 in the San Diego Magazine. It says he's a lawyer for "developmentally disabled". Yet, he's really a lawyer that works for the quasi government agency called "San Diego Regional Center." Ronald House is their lawyer, who goes to Office of Administrative Hearings and fights against families who are asking the service agency for help. The real lawyers who represent the developmentally disabled are Disability Right's Attorneys like Wendy Dumlao. And the lawyers at Protection and Advocacy, NOT Ronald R House. No doubt, the people behind nominating Ronald R House for this phony, misleading title are those who think it's great he has represented the San Diego Regional Center in many cases where parents of severely disabled children are DENIED services.
ReplyDeleteI just received a number of email solicitations from lawyer/acquaintances of mine who said, "I just nominated you as a Super Lawyer, and would appreciate it if you would nominate me..." I know a number of Super Lawyers and some are good and others are not so good. However, they all got there by having campaigned for it. A much more reliable review program is the AVVO rating system. If a lawyer is rated a "10" by AVVO, chances are he has excellent credentials.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, it appears that selection as a Super Lawyer contributes to the Avvo rating, as do peer reviews that can be solicited.
DeleteAVVO? I don't think so. Shortly after I joined, I was invited--by a lawyer I don't know--to provide a peer endorsement for him if he did the same for me. I then noticed that this lawyer, who was only a year out of law school, had hundreds of endorsements from lawyers all over the country--people who could not possibly have known him. Meanwhile, there are excellent attorneys who have bad ratings simply because they haven't joined up. AVVO is as much as scam as any of them. The goal is to attract advertising dollars, not to actually inform the public regarding the skills of member attorneys.
DeleteUsing the term 'Super Lawyer' simply for promotion is just not good. 'Super lawyers' do exist in real life. The other term for them can be the Best Lawyers . They are known so based on their dedication, hard work and commitment.
ReplyDeletehahaha, get outta here "best lawyers", I think you're drunk.
DeleteIn Oregon, the Super Lawyers are generally people I know to be good lawyers. Yeah, it's for advertising, but I think the publisher maintains some integrity by not generally picking idiots. Those who complain about it are usually not on the list.
ReplyDeleteSuper Lawyers is just a business promoting magazine like Yellow Pages. Even a super flop lawyer who has no business and never appears in a court can also be a super lawyer if he/she plays with tricks. It is totally misleading and falsifying the clients to show him/her better among others. It should be immediately stopped. It's all the nonsense propaganda.
ReplyDeleteA few weeks back I happened to be talking with a former colleague of mine. Just catching up on what's new. He's been sweating away at a medium sized form while I've been doing the solo route. He hasn't had a single trial. He's attended a few motion hearings. Lo n behold I see he is a Super Lawyer. Based upon what??
ReplyDeleteOne of the two managing partners at our firm (10 lawyer firm) is a "Super Lawyer" as is his protege son who just started here a few years ago. They are the only two in the firm who are "Super Lawyers". What i found hilarious was when the other managing partner called it a BS scam the other day.
ReplyDeleteThere are some legitimately good lawyers who the company must include for credibility, but the rest of
ReplyDeleteit -- watch out! There are a few attorneys, in my field, who are very far from being well-respected, and one who is a clear idiot, but all of them have been "Super Lawyers." They are best known for their compulsive marketing and networking, and definitely not for the quality of their work, and, it seems, that's the only way they could have become "Super Lawyers." Others in the field who know them just laugh.
'Super Attorney'? Super J.O.K.E. is more like it!
ReplyDeleteI made Chase 100 million in new busness. I requested an $800.00 high-back chair because I'm 6'11 and new neck pain started daily which I'd never had before. My doctor said I had no record of complaint going back 20 years. The chair I was given to use everyday was the same chair used by my 5'2 coworker? They gave me a form that stated my request for a high back chair was approved in 2/03. I have all documentation. My Op's manager who had/has a complex about my height (His PA told me he did) refused me the chair until 10/13/10, and only after I had a documented injury to my neck and an OHNurse became involved. I have emails, voicemails, Doctor's, Surgeons, Chiropractor, and PT opinions, which none were introduced during discovery or questioned during depositions. My 'Super Attorney' even stopped deps and pulled me into his personal office just to tell me they were lying 'under oath' and then did nothing to contest their positions? I've always admired lawyers until the day when my 'Super Attorney' turned into the 'Nutty Professor'! What an opportunity built on documented TRUTH that was thrown away by a weak personality. Shame for ME and super shame on the 'Super Attorney'!
ReplyDeleteThanks for letting me vent. I'm going to put the entire case, depositions and all documentation and voicemails (unsolicited) left on my personal phone by corporate OHNurse for all to see. When a company supports dishonesty a "that's the way business is done and we WIN', I feel the need to expose them. I had to retire 4 years early and I haven't had a good night's sleep for 10 years. My motivation is NOT money because all I asked for was a friggin' chair. Corporate took me to dinner at the 'Ruth Chris Steak House' (GREAT steak!!!) after flying in from NY to thank me with a dinner and handshake for making Chase millions in profit. My Op's manager only made fun of my order not one 'thank you' for your 'Exceeds Expectations' effort on behalf of Chase. Very disapointing 'round up' of my professional life. I was a dedicarted Chase employee from A to Z for 12 years and 6 days. My reward was to attack me personally (HR in NJ said my complaint about discrimination about my height by my OP's mgr. was baseless and then she forgot to disconnect the phone call we had just had as she referred to me as 'LURCH' to another person in her office in NJ). Our call was suppose to be private yet she had people listen in as we talked, probably coaching her since she made little sense. I immediately sent her an Email stating that she forgot to hang-up and I heard her 'LURCH' comment about my height. She Emailed back and said it was said with affection. A 6'9 TV show freak fron 62-63 is something all tall men want to be described as. NOT! If I had referred to her as one of the workers in the 'Best Little Whorehouse in Texas' does anyone think a complaint wouldn't have been submitted against me? Her ER boss in NY said she didn't mean anyrthing by it. Really? The entire case was a comedy of errors on behalf of my 'SUPER ATTORNEY', or better yet, 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Courtroom', my 'SUPER ATTORNEY" got lost!
ReplyDelete(I forgot spell check. This is corrected version. My apologies for sloppiness. Please delete first posting of same)
ReplyDeleteThanks for letting me vent. I'm going to put the entire case, depositions and all documentation and voice mail (unsolicited) left on my personal phone by corporate OHNurse for all to see. When a company supports dishonesty a "that's the way business is done and we WIN', I feel the need to expose them. I had to retire 4 years early and I haven't had a good night's sleep for 10 years. My motivation is NOT money because all I asked for was a friggin' chair. Corporate took me to dinner at the 'Ruth Chris Steak House' (GREAT steak!!!) after flying in from NY to thank me with a dinner and handshake for making Chase millions in profit. My Op's manager only made fun of my order not one 'thank you' for your 'Exceeds Expectations' effort on behalf of Chase. Very disappointing 'round up' of my professional life. I was a dedicated Chase employee from A to Z for 12 years and 6 days. My reward was to attack me personally (HR in NJ said my complaint about discrimination about my height by my OP's mgr. was baseless and then she forgot to disconnect the phone call we had just had as she referred to me as 'LURCH' to another person in her office in NJ). Our call was suppose to be private yet she had people listen in as we talked, probably coaching her since she made little sense. I immediately sent her an Email stating that she forgot to hang-up and I heard her 'LURCH' comment about my height. She Emailed back and said it was said with affection. A 6'9 TV show freak from 62-63 is something all tall men want to be described as. NOT! If I had referred to her as one of the workers in the 'Best Little Whorehouse in Texas' does anyone think a complaint wouldn't have been submitted against me? Her ER boss in NY said she didn't mean anything by it. Really? The entire case was a comedy of errors on behalf of my 'SUPER ATTORNEY', or better yet, 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Courtroom', my 'SUPER ATTORNEY" got lost!
Interesting how Super Lawyers is supposed to be a peer-reviewed selection process. I've been a lawyer for 24 years, and I've tried over 300 jury trials. Not once have I ever been asked for my two cents about a particular being a Super Lawyer. My grandfather always said that "if it looks like bullshit and smells like bullshit, don't be surprised to find out that it's bullshit".
ReplyDeleteIf you buy their advertisements, you'll shoot up to their top ten.
ReplyDeleteAmos N. Jones is a con artist
ReplyDelete-Look I am not even a lawyer and I knew it was a scheme. You hook into it like the bogus academy awards. Same principle with many shady string. It leaves the super lawyers up to being manipulated.I dealt with 2 of these clowns and they where in practice and real screw ups. I know of a few more too. But they should just stop watching "suits" and get real.
ReplyDeleteWhat a fantabulous post this has been. Never seen this kind of useful post. I am grateful to you and expect more number of posts like these. Thank you very much.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.eliaandponto.com/michigan-auto-accident-lawyer/
Age Discrimination Lawyers in Minnesota
ReplyDeleteFacing discrimination in the workplace due to age? Contact age discrimination lawyers in Minnesota for a claim. Get an initial consultation free.
to get more - http://satrelaw.com/age-discrimination-lawyers